Imagine imagine that you want to find a group of people how well they can do something. How do you begin? Perhaps you are developing a test method to determine reliable data? Far too expensive! Much easier it is to ask the individuals themselves, how they assess themselves regarding the ability to look yourself. That those affected know best how good they are and assess this course, realistic and critical, we all know, since there is on TV talent shows. you think this approach to be unscientific? Then have a look how the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees knowledge of German migrants identified. Quote of the commentary:
"The table shows results of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees conducted representative survey" Selected groups of migrants in Germany "(RAM) For the self-assessed knowledge of German respondents is seen that the oral. skills (listening and speaking) can be better than the written (reading and writing). It is clear nationality differences. The best German in the oral areas of competence, respondents attest from the former Yugoslavia and Italy. Even among the Greeks to write much of (very) good oral and written command of German is. Polish respondents have no such great differences between oral and written skills and be relatively common in "moderate" knowledge. Turkish respondents have in all areas of competence, the highest proportions of respondents with very poor or no knowledge of German. "
This information is the way free will for everyone is not accessible and must be bought with a price between two covers.
This information is the way free will for everyone is not accessible and must be bought with a price between two covers.
0 comments:
Post a Comment