It's always amazing how former teachers rise above their own guild, if they have left climbing the political ladder, the academic reality behind. A departure from the frontal teaching was necessary. Education Minister can Löhrmann really remember a significant number of former colleagues who had spoiled in the frontal lecturing teaching their students? Is it not rather the case that group work and learning since selbstentdeckendes long (and sometimes even to the absurd excesses) are with any teacher training and current practice in school? Lessons would be good if the students work more independently. - Did Ms. Löhrmann already forgotten the practical experience that independent learning needs time, time that is taken with the G8? Does it not true that the tuition market is in Unprecedented prosperity, because it offers what is the school for sheer creativity promotion too good: the frowned-upon but it is unfortunately necessary drums and practicing simple skills? Schools could offer parallel G8 and G9. - White woman Löhrmann what schools they staffed, financial and bureaucratic burdens, when parents and students makes the point in view, and with their return to two-thirds majority in the school conferences enforcement promoted amateur wishful thinking?
school is being chased by politicians changing with changing ideologies of a "reform" by the next. Everyone is talking to - but the real experts, the teachers. From swimming with her mostly still about 30 students per class in decades, reforms of the reforms, and now they indirectly endorse the call for better teacher training, once again pushed the blame for continued political botch in his shoes. It may be that we train teachers better could. But who is really in a politician?
Irmgard Kreye
0 comments:
Post a Comment